Integration of Operational Verbs, Objective Tests, Essay Tests, Scales, And Rubrics in Cognitive Assessment: A Literature Review

Aas Siti Sholichah; Muhamad Wijaksono; Fitri Hilmiyati; Deni Iriyadi

doi:10.59944/jipsi.v5i4.2274

Authors

Aas Siti Sholichah Universitas PTIQ Jakarta
Muhamad Wijaksono Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Maulana Hasanudin Banten
Fitri Hilmiyati
Deni Iriyadi Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59944/jipsi.v5i4.2274

Keywords:

cognitive assessment, operational verbs, objective test, essay test, assessment rubric

Abstract

Assessing cognitive learning outcomes requires instruments aligned with learning objectives and students’ expected cognitive abilities. This study aims to analyze the integration of operational verbs (KKO), objective tests, essay tests, rating scales, and rubrics in cognitive assessment. A qualitative approach using a literature review method was employed. Data were collected from scientific journal articles, academic books, conference proceedings, and other scholarly sources related to cognitive assessment, Bloom’s taxonomy, and assessment instruments. Data analysis involved content analysis and thematic synthesis to identify and connect findings across sources. The findings indicate that operational verbs link learning objectives with measurable indicators of cognitive abilities. Objective tests are effective for assessing structured responses, while essay tests provide opportunities to evaluate students’ abilities to explain, analyze, evaluate, and develop ideas. Rating scales and rubrics support assessment by clarifying performance criteria and improving scoring consistency. The study demonstrates that integrating these five components can strengthen the alignment between learning objectives, assessment instruments, and expected learning outcomes. Its significance lies in providing a conceptual foundation for teachers to design more systematic, fair, and comprehensive cognitive assessments. This integration can also help teachers obtain a clearer understanding of students’ cognitive achievement and support informed decisions to improve teaching and learning processes.

References

Arini, Ririn, Erwin Salpa Riansi, Ilah Fadillah, And Muhammad Khuluqin Hasan. 2024. “Peran Tes Objektif Dan Subjektif Dalam Mengukur Dasar.” Wilangan 5(3):236–44.

Et.Al, Dian Afrilianti. 2025. “Karakteristik Tes Yang Baik.” Journal Of Innovative And Creativity 5(2):1142–58.

Et.Al, Nia Kania. 2023. Evaluasi Pendidikan Sebuah Tinjauan Kritis. Majalengka: Cv. Edupedia Publisher.

George, M. W. 2008. The Elements Of Library Research: What Every Student Needs To Know. Princeton: University Press.

Gradini, Ega. 2022. “Development Of Rubric Of Higher Order Thinking Skills Assessment On Mathematics Learning.” Jurnal Teori Dan Aplikasi Matematika 6(1):61–74.

Idham, Muhammad, And Habib Rambe. 2025. “Penulisan Tujuan Pembelajaran ( Kata Kerja Operasional / Kko ).” Ijer 1(5):95–100.

Made, Ni, Rara Indah, Gede Wira Bayu, And Ni Wayan Rati. 2024. “Hots-Based Science Learning Outcomes Assessment Instrument For Measuring Elementary School Learning Outcomes.” Jurnal Mimbar Ilmu 29(1):156–62.

Marta, Muhammad Afif, Dimas Purnomo, Universitas Islam, Negeri Imam, And Bonjol Padang. 2025. “Konsep Taksonomi Bloom Dalam Desain Pembelajaran.” Lencana 3(1):227–46.

Nitko, A. J., & Brookhart, S. M. 2014. Educational Assessment Of Students. Perason.

Noven Kusainun. 2020. “Analisis Standar Penilaian Pendidikan Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Pendidikan 5(1):1–7.

Nurmaya, Eka, Ani Rusilowati, Budi Astuti, Postgraduate Universitas, Negeri Semarang, And Article Info. 2022. “Development Of Cognitive Ability Test Instrument Based On Revision Bloom Taxonomy On Dynamic Electricity Materials For Students Of.” Physics Communication 6(37):50–60.

Rassul, Tahsin Hussein. 2022. “An Investigation Of Constructive Alignment Between Learning Outcomes And Assessment In English Department Modules.” ناکەییتەیاڤۆرم ەتسناز ۆب ۆکناز ىراڤۆگ 26(236):293–316.

Ridha, Achmad Rasyid, Nur Ali Rahmatullah, Aidatun Nisrina, And Nurul Firdaus. 2025. “Hasil Belajar Sebagai Objek Penilaian (Kognitif, Afektif, Dan Psikomotor).” Inovasi 3(3):1–8.

Rukmana, Musma, And Aisyiah Restutiningsih Putri. 2024. “Development Of Hots-Based Cognitive Assessment Instruments To Train Students ’ Critical Thinking Skills Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Kognitif Berbasis Hots Untuk Melatih Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa.” Biopedagogia 6(2):161–72.

Slavča Hristov Et.Al. 2023. “Constructive Alignment Between Objectives, Teaching And Learning Activities, Student Competencies And Assessment Methods In Higher Education.” Agriculture, Journal O F Sciences, Plant 21(2):21–36.

Thomas, James, And Angela Harden. 2008. “Methods For The Thematic Synthesis Of Qualitative Research In Systematic Reviews.” Bmc Medical Research Methology 10:1–10. Doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-45.

Wicaksono, Grahito. 2026. “Analisis Kemampuan Guru Mengimplementasikan Pembelajaran Mendalam Pada Desain Pedagogis.” Journal Of Social And Scientifik Education 3(2):349–70.

Widiana, I. W., Program Studi, Pendidikan Dasar, And Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha. 2021. “Pengembangan Instrumen Asesmen Keterampilan Menulis Dan Berpikir Kritis Pada Pelajaran Ipa Terintegrasi Sekolah Dasar.” Jurnal Peelitian Dan Evaluasi 11(2):93–104.

Zahir, Abdul, Syarifah Ainun Harahap, And Ryan Puby Sumarta. 2025. Evaluasi Pendidikan. Padang: Cv Luminary Press Indonesia.