Living Madhhab Moderation In Modern Islamic Boarding Schools: Dynamics Of Islamic Legal Thought At Pondok Modern Darussalam Gontor 11 Poso

Authors

  • Irsyad Abd Raziq Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar
  • Usman Jafar Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar
  • Abdul Wahid Haddade Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar
  • Rian Hidayat Universitas Megarezky Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59944/jipsi.v5i3.1227

Keywords:

Empirical Islamic Law, Islamic Legal Thought, Living Madhhab Moderation, Madhhab Moderation, Modern Islamic Boarding School

Abstract

Diversity of legal schools is an inherent characteristic of Islamic legal tradition, yet its management in Islamic educational institutions has largely been examined from a normative perspective. Limited attention has been given to how madhhab moderation is institutionalized as an educational culture. This study investigates the implementation of Living Madhhab Moderation in Pondok Modern Darussalam Gontor 11 Poso, the dynamics of Islamic legal thought cultivated within the institution, and its implications for the intellectual character formation of students. This research employed a qualitative approach within the framework of empirical Islamic law. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, participant observation, and document analysis involving school leaders, teachers, and students. Thematic analysis was conducted using the theoretical perspectives of wasatiyyah, fiqh al-ikhtilaf, and living Islamic law. The findings demonstrate that madhhab moderation is institutionalized through curriculum integration, comparative jurisprudence learning, academic dialogue, teacher role modeling, and the daily educational culture of the boarding school. The dynamics of Islamic legal thought are developed through mastery of classical Islamic texts, principles of Islamic legal methodology, structured scholarly discussions, and continuous training in legal reasoning. These processes cultivate students who appreciate methodological diversity in Islamic jurisprudence, demonstrate critical legal reasoning, respect the ethics of scholarly disagreement, and respond constructively to contemporary Islamic legal issues. The study further reveals that the sustainability of madhhab moderation depends on an integrated institutional culture that combines academic excellence, religious values, and social responsibility. This study proposes Living Madhhab Moderation as a conceptual framework explaining madhhab moderation as a lived practice of Islamic law embedded within the educational system of modern Islamic boarding schools. The framework contributes to the development of empirical Islamic legal studies and provides a theoretical foundation for designing more inclusive, dialogical, and context-responsive Islamic education.

References

Abdullah, A. N., Daud, M., Mohamad, S., Abd Rahman, M. M., Hj Yusoff, M. A., & Hj Ali, M. B. (2020). Fanatik Mazhab di Malaysia: Punca, Implikasi dan Langkah Mengharmoni Menurut Pandangan Ilmuan Islam Sectarian Fanaticism in Malaysia: Causes, Implications, and Measures for Harmonization According to the Views of Islamic Scholars. Al-Basirah Journal, 9(2), 11–35. https://doi.org/10.22452/basirah.vol9no2.2

Abu Baedah, S. S., Musolin, M. H., & Nurlaelah. (2026). Dialectics of Fiqh al-Ikhtilāf: A Comparative Madhhab Analysis of Legal Pluralism in Contemporary Muslim Societies. Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab, 8(1 SE-Articles), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.24252/mazahibuna.vi.64995

Alkouatli, C. (2024). Illuminating data beyond the tangible: exploring a conceptually-relevant paradigmatic frame for empirical inquiry with Muslim educators. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 37(8), 2466–2484. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2024.2318301

Azizy, A. Q. (2004). Reformasi Bermazhab: Sebuah Ihtiar Menuju Ijtihad Sesuai Saintifik. Teraju.

Chakim, M. L., & Nurfalah, Y. (2026). Internalisasi Nilai Moderasi Beragama dalam Living Fikih di Pesantren. Intelektual: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Studi Keislaman, 16(1 SE-Articles), 117–138. https://doi.org/10.33367/ji.v16i1.7930

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Sage publications.

Damopolii, M., U, M. S., & Burga, M. A. (2023). The Phenomenon of Punishment at Pesantren in South Sulawesi: An Islamic Law and Islamic Education Approaches. In Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam (Vol. 7, Issues 3 SE-Articles, pp. 1643–1660). https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v7i3.18207

Daud, Z. F. M. (2021). Fiqh Across Madhhabs: An Alternative to Pesantren Students’ School of Thought Exclusivism in the Post-Truth Era. Mazahib, 20(1 SE-Articles), 143–168. https://doi.org/10.21093/mj.v20i1.3081

Fitriani, M. I. (2023). Islamic Religious Education and Interreligious Tolerance in a Multi-Religious Country: Challenges, Typological Implications, and the Proposed Strategy. Ulumuna, 27(1 SE-Articles), 416–448. https://doi.org/10.20414/ujis.v27i1.765

Hallaq, W. B. (1984). Was the gate of ijtihad closed? International Journal of Middle East Studies, 16(1), 3–41.

Hallaq, W. B. (2009). An introduction to Islamic law. Cambridge University Press.

Hasbiyallah, H., Duran, B. N., & Suhendi, S. (2024). Indonesian Fiqh in higher education: A pathway to moderate and inclusive Islamic values. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 10(1), 149–162.

Junaidi, J., Tanshzil, S. W., & Ni Kadek Suwardani. (2025). Religious Moderation Research (2016–2025): Systematic Review and Bibliometric Mapping. Harmoni, 24(2), 185–214. https://doi.org/10.32488/harmoni.v24i2.888

Kamali, M. H. (2008). Maqasid al-Shariah made simple (Vol. 13). International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT).

Laabdi, M. (2024). Ilm al-ikhtilāf in Modern Western and Muslim Studies of Juristic Disagreement–A Critical Analysis. Journal of College of Sharia and Islamic Studies, 42(2 SE-Articles in English), 185–201. https://doi.org/10.29117/jcsis.2024.0389

Muhajir, M., Kultsum, U., Miftachul Choiri, M., Mustonah, S., Kulkarni, H., & Karim, A. (2025). Integrating Multicultural Values to Foster Tolerance and Inclusivity in Islamic Religious Education. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 11(1 SE-Articles), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.15575/jpi.v11i1.44607

Munir, M., & Ukhrawiyah, F. (2025). Fiqh Studies and Critical Thinking in Pesantren-Based Islamic Education: Revisiting UNESCO’s Four Pillars. IJIBS, 3(2), 115–125.

Nashihin, M. I., Majeed, M. K., Derysmono, Armadi, A., & Syukur, A. (2025). The Role of Pesantren Culture in Developing Academic Character : A Study on the Positive Impact of the Cultural Environment at Pesantren Luhur Sabilussalam. Mimbar Agama Budaya, 42(1), 89–105. https://doi.org/10.15408/mimbar.v42i1.45255

Rahmawati, R. F. (2022). Pendidikan Moderasi Beragama di Lembaga Pesantren Modern. National Conference on Educational Science and Counselling, 2(1), 147–156.

Rambe, P., Sabaruddin, & Maryam. (2022). Model Moderasi Beragama berbasis Pesantren Salaf: Studi Kasus pada Madrasah Salafiyyah. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam Al-Thariqah, 7(1 SE-Articles), 157–168. https://doi.org/10.25299/al-thariqah.2022.vol7(1).9599

Sairi, M. (2021). Sectarianism in Islam: The Study of Khawarij and Majlis Mujahidin Indonesia. Mimbar Agama Budaya, 38(1), 59–67. https://doi.org/10.15408/mimbar.v38i1.24181

Sarwenda. (2014). Pembelajaran Kritis di Pesantren: Studi Kasus di Pesantren Pertanian Darul Fallah Bogor. TARBIYA: Journal of Education in Muslim Society, 1(2 SE-Articles), 149–164. https://doi.org/10.15408/tjems.v1i2.1265

Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(2), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-2004-22201

Shokhibul Mighfar, Muhammad Faidulloh Al Hasani, & Muhammad Habib Kamil. (2025). Perbandingan Lintas Mazhab Fikih sebagai Upaya Penguatan Moderasi Beragama dalam Pendidikan Agama Islam. Wildan: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 4(1 SE-Articles), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.54125/wildan.v4i01.92

Subekti, S., & Hilmy, M. (2024). Constructing Education in Sustaining Islamic Values Based on Local Culture Among the Fisherfolk Community. Al-Hayat: Journal of Islamic Education, 8(2), 711–723. https://doi.org/10.35723/ajie.v8i2.575

Sutrisnawati, M. S., & Pangestuti, R. (2024). Pesantren Sebagai Media Moderasi Beragama di Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian Agama, 25(1 SE-Articles), 89–103. https://doi.org/10.24090/jpa.v25i1.2024.pp89-103

Wimra, Z., Huda, Y., Bunaiya, M., & Hakimi, A. R. (2023). The Living Fiqh: Anatomy, Philosophical Formulation, and Scope of Study. JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah), 22(1), 185–198. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v22i1.9491

Yani, M. T., Hazin, M., Ahmadi, A., Hanafi, Y., Rahmawati, N. W. D., Ladiqi, S., Saiban, K., & Supian. (2025). The phenomenon of intolerance in Islamic educational institutions (madrasahs): An analysis of its manifestations, causes, and prevention policies. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 9(7), 2026353. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2026353

Yaqin, A., Rozi, S., & Sham, F. M. (2020). The Paradox of Pesantren Education in the Implementation of Islamic Law: Study of Pesantren Kyai Notion in Mojokerto. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 9(1 SE-Articles), 129–148. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpi.2020.91.129-148

Yasin, M., & Khasbulloh, M. N. (2022). Constructing Ethical Critical Thinking at Pesantren. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 8(2 SE-Articles), 127–144. https://doi.org/10.15575/jpi.v8i2.19028

Downloads

Published

2026-07-07