Pembuktian Dan Alat Bukti Pengakuan Perspektif Fuqaha Dan Hukum Perdata
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59944/jipsi.v5i3.1215Keywords:
Evidence, Evidence Confession, Fuqaha, Civil LawAbstract
Evidence is a fundamental element in dispute resolution, both from an Islamic and civil law perspective, as it serves as the basis for judges to establish certainty about the truth of a legal event before rendering a verdict. One form of evidence that holds a crucial position in both legal systems is confession (*al-iqrār*). This study aims to analyze the concept of proof, the status of confession evidence from the perspective of jurists and Indonesian civil law, and its relevance in the Indonesian judicial system. This study employed library research with a qualitative approach. Data were obtained from fiqh books, books, scientific journals, laws and regulations, and other relevant scientific sources. The results indicate that proof in Islamic law has a normative basis derived from the Qur'an and the Hadith, while Indonesian civil law regulates confession as evidence in Article 164 of the HIR and Article 1866 of the Civil Code. Islamic jurists agree that a confession has high evidentiary value if it is made by a legally competent party, voluntarily, and against a clear object. Conversely, civil law places greater emphasis on the legal consequences of a confession in the evidentiary process. Despite differences in philosophical foundations and application requirements, both legal systems place confessions as a crucial form of evidence in achieving legal certainty and justice.
References
Al-Kāsānī. (1986). Badā’iʿ al-ṣanā’iʿ fī tartīb al-sharā’iʿ (Dār al-Kut).
Al-Marghīnānī. (2000). Al-Hidāyah sharḥ Bidāyat al-Mubtadī (Dār Iḥyā’ al-Turāth al-’Arabī (ed.)).
Al-Zuḥailī, W. (1989). Al-fiqh al-Islāmī wa adillatuhu (Dār al-Fik).
Aminah, S. (2023). MENELUSURI PENERAPAN ALAT BUKTI DI PENGADILAN DALAM PERADILAN ISLAM (BUKTI IQRAR, BUKTI SAKSI, BUKTI SURAT, BUKTI SUMPAH DAN QARINAH). Jurnal Pendidikan Keislaman Dan Kemasyarakatan, 13(2), 167–186. http://ejournal.staiyapistakalar.ac.id/index.php/DahzainNur%0AMENELUSURI
Azam Mohd Shariff, A., Rajamanickam, R., Kaur Harnam Singh1, P., Khadijah Md Lazim, S., Sofea Nurol Adzmi, A., Xin Xian, L., Faris Haikal Mad Zahudi, M., & Noor Azira Tg. Zainudin, T. (2018). Admissibility of Iqrar as Evidence: the Issue of Voluntariness from Syariah Principles Perspective. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(3.30), 104. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.30.18211
Ely Baharini, Jovita Irawati, R. M. V. (2025). KEDUDUKAN AKTA PPAT SEBAGAI ALAT BUKTI OTENTIK DALAM RANCANGAN KUHAP. Notary Journal, 5(1), 87–88.
Jamil, M. J. (1997). Pembuktian di Peradilan Agama. Al-Qadau PERADILAN Dan HUKUM KELUARGA ISLAM, 4(1), 2017.
Jayadi, H. (2023). Searching for Material Truth in Civil Trials Based on Civil Procedure Law in Indonesia. International Journal of Law and Politics Studies, 5(4), 49–53. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijlps.2023.5.4.6
Katsīr, I. (2010). Tafsīr al-Qurʾān al-ʿAẓīm.
Komang Rama Agastya. (2025). Analisis Pembuktian Dalam Sengketa Perdata Mengenai Wanprestasi Dalam Perjanjian. Semarang Law Review (SLR), 6(2), 340–349. https://doi.org/10.26623/slr.v6i2.12853
Laily Az Zahra, K., Mufid Al Amjad, M. F., Nabya Maulidian, S., Silvia, S., & Azfa Asyifa, F. (2024). Relevansi Kepentingan Alat-Alat Bukti Dalam Proses Penyelesaian Hukum Perdata. The Juris, 8(1), 95–104. https://doi.org/10.56301/juris.v8i1.1185
Muhammad, A. A. (1993). Shohih Al-Bukhari. Darul Ibnu Katsir, Damaskus :Juz 1, h.3.
Muhammad, H. bin. (2018). Hukum Islam dan Hukum Pembuktian Perdata Serta Isu-Isu Menarik Terhadap Perkembangannya (Sebuah Studi Komperatif). Al-Risalah: Forum Kajian Hukum Dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan, 15(01), 74–100. https://doi.org/10.30631/alrisalah.v15i01.380
Muhammad, M. Y. (2025). Kaidah Fikih al-Yaqīn Lā Yazūl bi al-Syak dan Realisasinya terhadap Tangkapan Layar Ponsel sebagai Alat Bukti Pengadilan. AL-QIBLAH: Jurnal Studi Islam Dan Bahasa Arab, 4(5), 605–618. https://doi.org/10.36701/qiblah.v4i5.2632
Muhammad Taufan Djafri, Asri, A., & Ihsan Muhammad. (2024). Tinjauan Hukum Islam terhadap Rekaman Suara sebagai Alat Bukti Tindak Pidana di Peradilan. AL-QIBLAH: Jurnal Studi Islam Dan Bahasa Arab, 3(3), 325–350. https://doi.org/10.36701/qiblah.v3i3.1451
Nurul Hidayah Ritonga, Z. (2025). The Position of The Defendant’s Statement as Evidence in The Perpective of Islamic Criminal Justice. Justitia Jurnal Hukum, 9(2), 193–204. https://doi.org/10.36501/justitia.v1i2.193
Qudāmah, I. (1997). Al-Mughnī. Riyadh: Dār ’Ālam al-Kutub.
Rusydi, B. A. (2020). Problem Kehadiran Dan Upaya Hukum Tergugat Dalam Putusan Verstek Perkara Perceraian Pada Pengadilan Agama Bandung. Muslim Heritage, 5(2), 393. https://doi.org/10.21154/muslimheritage.v5i2.2362
Saenah, S. (2017). JENIS-JENIS ALAT BUKTI: STUDI PERBANDINGAN ANTARA HUKUM ISLAM DAN HUKUM ACARA PERDATA. Jurista, 6(1), 68–83. http://www.jurista.cefalsap.com/index.php/jurista
Saenah, S. (2019). TYPES OF EVIDENCE: A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN ISLAMIC LAW AND CIVIL PROCEDURE LAW. JURISTA, 1(1), 105–112.
Saenah, S. (2020). TYPES OF EVIDENCE: A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN ISLAMIC LAW AND CIVIL PROCEDURE LAW. JURISTA, 4(1), 70–93.
Saepullah, A. (2018). Peranan alat bukti dalam hukum acara peradilan. Mahkamah: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam, 3(1), 141–157.
Subagiya, B. (2023). Penelitian kepustakaan (library research) dalam penelitian PAI. Ta’dibuna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 12(3), 304–318. https://doi.org/10.32832/tadibuna.v12i3.14113
Widyastuti, E. F. (2021). Kedudukan Sertipikat Elektronik Sebagai Alat Bukti Dan Tanggung Jawab Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah Serta Kantor Pertanahan. Jurnal Officium Notarium, 1(3), 476–484. https://doi.org/10.20885/jon.vol1.iss3.art7
Winston Jeremia Towoliu, Hendrik Pondaag, R. V. K. (2012). EKSISTENSI PENGAKUAN DAN SUMPAH TERHADAP PEMBUKTIAN DALAM PERKARA PERDATA.
