Integrasi Kajian Tafsir dan Linguistik Arab dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab Kontemporer
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59944/jipsi.v5i1.1107Keywords:
Arabic linguistics, educational interpretation, educational verses, thematic interpretation, Qur’an.Abstract
This study aims to analyze the contribution of the Arabic linguistic approach in interpreting educational verses in the Qur’an. The study is based on the tendency to understand educational verses through literal translation, while the linguistic meanings embedded in the Arabic structure of the Qur’an are often not explored deeply. This research uses a qualitative library research approach with a thematic interpretation method. The primary data are Qur’anic verses related to education, including QS. Al-‘Alaq verses 1 to 5, QS. Al-Baqarah verse 31, QS. Al-Mujadilah verse 11, QS. Luqman verses 12 to 19, QS. Ali Imran verse 164, and QS. Al-Jumu’ah verse 2. The analysis uses nahwu, sharaf, semantics, and balaghah approaches. The findings show that the nahwu approach helps explain sentence structure and the direction of meaning in educational verses. The sharaf approach clarifies word meanings through roots and morphological patterns. The semantic approach reveals the network of educational meanings in key terms such as ‘ilm, ta‘lim, tarbiyah, tazkiyah, hikmah, and adab. The balaghah approach strengthens the understanding of the Qur’an’s pedagogical messages. This study concludes that Arabic linguistics serves as an important foundation for developing an accurate, systematic, and relevant educational interpretation of the Qur’an for contemporary Islamic education.
References
Abdalla, Mohamad. 2025. “Exploring Tarbiyah in Islamic Education: A Critical Review of the English-and Arabic-Language Literature.” Education Sciences 15 (5): 559.
Abdelkarim, M B A, and A A M Alhaj. 2023. “Probing the Meaning Loss in the Translation of Arabic Qur’ānic Connotative Words into English: A Linguistic Semantic Perspective.” Theory and Practice in Language Studies 13 (10): 2644–51. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1310.23.
Abdul-Ghafour, A Q K, A Aladdin, I S Zainudin, and N Mat Awal. 2022. “Contextual Meanings of Qur’ānic near-Synonyms and Their Translations.” Ijaz Arabi Journal of Arabic Learning 5 (3): 796–811. https://doi.org/10.18860/ijazarabi.v5i3.16519.
Aulia, M G, and M Arif. 2025. “Tafsir Tarbawi: Perspektif Pendidikan Islam Dalam Memahami Ayat-Ayat Al Qur’an.” QuranicEdu: Journal of Islamic Education 5 (1): 17–32. https://doi.org/10.37252/quranicedu.v5i1.1289.
Durie, M. 2022. “Semantic Decomposition of Four Quranic Words.” Russian Journal of Linguistics 26 (4): 937–69. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-30779.
Farhan, R L, A S Himam, and M A Ghofur. 2024. “Reinterpreting Qur’anic Themes: Muṣṭafa Muslim’s Approach to Mauḍū’ī Tafsir.” Al-Karim: International Journal of Quranic and Islamic Studies 2 (1): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.33367/al-karim.v2i1.4844.
Ismail, A. 2024. “Exploring New Arabic Semantic Paradigms for Understanding the Quran: Addressing Interpretive Gaps and Hidden Meanings.” Ijaz Arabi Journal of Arabic Learning 7 (3): 1352–64. https://doi.org/10.18860/ijazarabi.v7i3.27123.
Janah, N R, M Ali, and I Arifudin. 2026. “Problematika Pemaknaan Istilah Pendidikan Islam Dalam Perspektif Semantik Arab.” Aphorisme: Journal of Arabic Language, Literature, and Education 7 (1). https://doi.org/10.37680/aphorisme.v7i1.9051.
Kafrawi, K, Z Zamsiswaya, and A May. 2025. “Arabic Linguistic and Literary Approaches in Interpreting Educational Verses: A Study of the Tafsirs of Al-Misbah.” Dinasti International Journal of Education Management and Social Science 6 (5): 3659–80. https://doi.org/10.38035/dijemss.v6i5.4618.
Kembaren, F R W, E Daulay, M H Lubis, and R F Siregar. 2024. “Translation of Arabic Polysemy in the Holy Quran: A Comparative Analysis.” Scope: Journal of English Language Teaching 9 (1): 177–84. https://doi.org/10.30998/scope.v9i1.20772.
Mårtensson, U. 2022. “Linguistic Theory in Tafsīr between 100/400 and 700/1000: Implications for Qur’anic Studies.” Journal of Qur’anic Studies 24 (3): 1–45. https://doi.org/10.3366/jqs.2022.0514.
Maulidya, S R, M A Ghozali, and K A Hutagalung. 2024. “Lexical Relations and Contextual Meaning Analysis of Surah Al-Kahf in Abdullah Yusuf Ali’s English Translation.” LiNGUA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa Dan Sastra 19 (1). https://doi.org/10.18860/ling.v19i1.25920.
Najib, A F R, A I Haq, K Budiyanto, and H Haqiqi. 2026. “Revisiting Synonymy in the Glorious Qur’an: A Semantic Analysis of Itmām and Ikmāl.” Buletin Al-Turas 32 (1). https://doi.org/10.15408/bat.v32i1.47025.
Nirwana AN, A, Y Dahliana, A Rhain, K Nugroho, A Nurrahim, A Azizah, and Z Daud. 2025. “Mapping Quranic Exegesis Research: Trends, Contributions, and Future Directions.” Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun 13 (1). https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v13i1.1250.
Nurhayati, Nurhayati, and Kemas Imron Rosadi. 2022. “Determinasi Manajemen Pendidikan Islam: Sistem Pendidikan, Pengelolaan Pendidikan Dan Tenaga Pendidikan Islam.” International Edition 3 (1): 451–64.
Sawalha, M, F Alshargi, S Yagi, A T AlShdaifat, and B Hammo. 2025. “MASAQ Parser: A Fine-Grained Morphosyntactic Analyzer for the Quran BT - Proceedings of the New Horizons in Computational Linguistics for Religious Texts.” Association for Computational Linguistics. https://aclanthology.org/2025.clrel-1.7/.
Susanti, L, M F Al Khoiron, A Nurhuda, and M Al Fajri. 2023. “The Reality of Tarbiyah, Ta’lim, and Ta’dib in Islamic Education.” Suhuf 35 (2). https://journals.ums.ac.id/suhuf/article/view/22964.
Zainuddin, Fauziah, and Norhayati Che Hat. 2025. “Qur’anic Insights on Educational Evaluation: A Semantic Study.” Langkawi: Journal of The Association for Arabic and English 11 (1): 49–62.
Zakaria, N H, and S Yaacob. 2025. “Morphological and Syntactic Semantics of Lexical Polysemy in the Qur’an Using ‘Fitna’ as a Case Study.” Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal 10 (SI33): 33–38. https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v10iSI33.7033.
