Peningkatan Pemahaman Materi Laju Reaksi Melalui Model Pembelajaran Project Based Learning Siswa Kelas Xi SMAN 1 Teluk Bintan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59944/jipsi.v5i2.1003Keywords:
Project Based Learning, conceptual understanding, reaction rate, chemistry learning, senior high school students.Abstract
This study aims to analyze the improvement of students’ understanding of reaction rate material through the implementation of the Project Based Learning model among eleventh-grade students at SMAN 1 Teluk Bintan. This research used a quantitative approach with a quasi-experimental method and a pretest-posttest control group design. The research sample consisted of two classes, namely an experimental class with 32 students and a control class with 31 students. The experimental class received instruction using the Project Based Learning model, while the control class received conventional instruction. Data were collected through a conceptual understanding test, student activity observation, and documentation. The results showed that the average pretest score of the experimental class was 56.81 and increased to 84.37 in the posttest. The control class obtained an average pretest score of 55.67 and increased to 73.45 in the posttest. The t-test result showed a significance value of 0.000 < 0.05, indicating a significant effect of Project Based Learning on students’ conceptual understanding. The N-Gain score of the experimental class was 0.68, which was categorized as moderate, while the control class obtained an N-Gain score of 0.39, which was categorized as low. Therefore, Project Based Learning is effective in improving students’ understanding of reaction rate material.
References
Bulus, Mustafa. 2021. “Sample Size Determination and Optimal Design of Randomized/Non-Equivalent Pretest-Posttest Control-Group Designs.” Adıyaman University Journal of Educational Sciences 11 (1): 48–69. https://doi.org/10.17984/adyuebd.941434.
Capili, Bernadette, and J K Anastasi. 2024. “An Introduction to Types of Quasi-Experimental Designs.” AJN, American Journal of Nursing 124 (11): 50–52. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0001081740.74815.20.
Hanisa, S, K Mustapa, R Ratman, D S Ahmar, and H Mawaddah. 2023. “The Influence of Project-Based Learning Model on Students’ Learning Outcomes in Reaction Rate Material.” Journal of Disruptive Learning Innovation 4 (2): 107–15. https://doi.org/10.17977/um072v4i22023p107-115.
Harahap, I P P, and D Novita. 2021. “Identify Misconception on Reaction Rate Concept Using Four-Tier Multiple Choice (4TMC) Diagnostic Test Instrument.” Journal of Chemistry Education Research 5 (1): 6–11. https://doi.org/10.26740/jcer.v5n1.p6-11.
Jere, S. 2024. “Enhancing Learners’ Conceptual Understanding of Reaction Kinetics Using Computer Simulations Supported by the Predict-Observe-Explain Strategy.” Research in Science Education 54: 1249–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-024-10182-5.
Maulana, R, A Kington, J Ko, X Feng, M Helms-Lorenz, B Looker, K Hibbert-Mayne, and K Blackmore. 2023. “Observing Secondary School Teachers’ Effective Teaching Behavior in the Netherlands, England, and the United States Using the ICALT Observation Instrument.” Frontiers in Education 8: 1068938. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1068938.
Nurdiana, L, E Winaryati, E T W Maharani, Z H Ikhsan, R A A Rauf, and A Salaffudin. 2024. “Implementation of STEM-Integrated PjBL Based on Lesson Study: Improving Students’ Critical Thinking Skills.” Journal of Educational Chemistry 6 (2): 71–84. https://doi.org/10.21580/jec.2024.6.2.22640.
Nurhayati, Dina Liana, Mukhammad. 2025. “The Relationship between Communication System , Work Motivation , and Reward Management with Human Resource Development in Madrasah” 09 (02): 591–605. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.33650/al-tanzim.v.
Nurhayati, N, M Latif, and K Anwar. 2024. “The Influence of Organizational Culture, Career Expectations, and Leadership Beliefs On Achievement Motivation In Integrated Islamic Primary Schools Riau Islands ….” Dinasti International Journal of … 5 (5): 1150–68. https://doi.org/10.31933/dijemss.v5i5.
Rahayu, I, Wiji, T Widhiyanti, and S Mulyani. 2024. “Analysis of Misconceptions on the Factors That Affect the Reaction Rate.” KnE Social Sciences 9 (13): 140–50. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i13.15914.
Rahmawati, D F, and R Fadhilah. 2022. “The Effectiveness of the STEM Approach on Science Process Skills in Studying Reaction Rate.” European Journal of Mathematics and Science Education 3 (2): 135–43. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmse.3.2.135.
Sholeh, M I, P J Laksono, R Rahmawati, and F Amelia. 2025. “Analyzing Pre-Service Chemistry Teachers’ Understanding and Misconceptions of Reaction Rates Using a Four-Tier Diagnostic Instrument.” Orbital: Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia 9 (1): 14–28. https://doi.org/10.19109/ojpk.v9i1.27811.
Siregar, N, and D Syafriani. 2024. “Development of E-Modules Based on Project Based Learning (PjBL) to Increase Student’s Interest in Learning and Learning Outcomes on Reaction Rate Material.” Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Pembelajaran 9 (2). https://doi.org/10.33394/jtp.v9i2.11156.
Upsher, R, E Dommett, S Carlisle, S Conner, G Codina, A Nobili, and N Byrom. 2025. “Improving Reporting Standards in Quantitative Educational Intervention Research: Introducing the CLOSER and CIDER Checklists.” Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research 14 (1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44322-024-00022-9.
Ye, S, M Elmgren, M Jacobsson, and F M Ho. 2024. “How Much Is Just Maths? Investigating Problem Solving in Chemical Kinetics at the Interface of Chemistry and Mathematics Through the Development of an Extended Mathematical Modelling Cycle.” Chemistry Education Research and Practice 25: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3RP00168G.
Zhang, L, and Y Ma. 2023. “A Study of the Impact of Project-Based Learning on Student Learning Effects: A Meta-Analysis Study.” Frontiers in Psychology 14: 1202728. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1202728.
