Diskresi Pejabat Imigrasi dalam Penerapan Tindakan Administrasi Keimigrasian (TAK) dan Implikasinya terhadap Pengenaan Sanksi Pidana

Authors

  • Atha Yanuar Rafi Politeknik Imigrasi dan Pemasyarakatan Indonesia, Tangerang Banten, Indonesia
  • Eric Theo Vanes Surbakti Politeknik Imigrasi dan Pemasyarakatan Indonesia, Tangerang Banten, Indonesia
  • Enggar Eka Fahrurriza Politeknik Imigrasi dan Pemasyarakatan Indonesia, Tangerang Banten, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59944/amorti.v5i1.812

Keywords:

Discretion, Administrative Immigration Actions, Legal Certainty, Criminal Sanctions, Administrative Law

Abstract

This study is motivated by the unclear boundaries of immigration officers’ discretion in the implementation of Administrative Immigration Actions (TAK), which has implications for the potential imposition of criminal sanctions. Discretion, as an instrument of administrative law, is fundamentally intended to address legal limitations in concrete situations. However, in practice, such discretion often leads to multiple interpretations and may be classified as an abuse of authority. The main issue lies in the blurred distinction between administrative authority and criminal violations, resulting in legal uncertainty and the risk of criminalizing immigration officers. This study aims to analyze the normative limits of discretion, examine its implications for criminal sanctions, and formulate efforts to strengthen legal certainty. The research employs a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The data consist of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials analyzed using qualitative descriptive methods. The findings indicate that the ambiguity in the limits of discretion leads to an overlap between administrative and criminal law, thereby increasing the potential for criminalization. Therefore, it is necessary to clarify the boundaries of discretion, strengthen technical regulations, and harmonize legal frameworks to ensure legal certainty and protection.

References

Adiyanta, F. C. S. (2019). Pembaruan Hukum Nasional: Pruralisme, Unifikasi Hukum, dan Hubungan Kewenangan antara Pemerintah Pusat dengan Pemerintah Daerah. Administrative Law and Governance Journal, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.14710/alj.v2i1.93-105

Arya Dwi Arrahman, R., Reygian Syaputri, B., Ariij Trinanda, C., & Wulandari, W. (2025). Tantangan dan Peluang Diskresi Pejabat Tun dalam Kerangka OSS-RBA Pasca UU Cipta Kerja. Cerdika: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 5(12). https://doi.org/10.59141/CERDIKA.V5I12.3009

Assyakurrohim, D., Ikhram, D., Sirodj, R. A., & Afgani, M. W. (2022). Metode Studi Kasus dalam Penelitian Kualitatif. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Dan Komputer, 3(01). https://doi.org/10.47709/jpsk.v3i01.1951

Banjarnahor, A. C., & Priyana, P. (2022). ANALISIS YURIDIS CYBERCRIME TERHADAP PENANGANAN KASUS PHISING KREDIVO. HERMENEUTIKA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.33603/hermeneutika.v6i1.6754

Fathony, F. (2025). Perlindungan Hukum Penggunaan Senjata Api oleh Pejabat Imigrasi: Studi Kasus Indonesia dan Praktik Internasional. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.56370/JHLG.V6I1.839

Gusasi, V., M Wantu, F., & Rahman Y. Mantali, A. (2023). Tinjauan Yuridis Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Anak Berdasarkan Putusan No 34/Pid.Sus/2022.Pn.Lbo. Journal of Comprehensive Science (JCS), 2(5), 1388–1395. https://doi.org/10.59188/JCS.V2I5.356

Handayani, P., Utha, A., & Kambolong, M. (2016). ANALISIS KUALITAS LAYANAN INOVASI LISTRIK PRABAYAR DALAM MENINGKATKAN KEPUASAN PELANGGAN PADA PT. PLN (PERSERO) CABANG KENDARI. Business UHO: Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis, 1(1), 214. https://doi.org/10.52423/BUJAB.V1I1.9619

Junaedi, E., & Fitriyantica, A. (2025). Legalitas Diskresi Pejabat Eksekutif dalam Praktik Birokrasi Pemerintahan: Kajian Komparatif Antara Indonesia dan Negara-Negara Eropa. POSTULAT, 3(2), 30–38. https://doi.org/10.37010/POSTULAT.V3I2.2034

Kamal Hasan Al Hadar, RR. Cahyowati, & M. Saleh. (2024). Penyalahgunaan Visa On Arrival (VoA) Di Indonesia Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2011 Tentang Keimigrasian (Studi Di Wilayah Kerja Kantor Imigrasi Mataram). Jurnal Diskresi, 3(2), 113–119. https://doi.org/10.29303/DISKRESI.V3I2.6019

Otari, C. E., Tamtomo, H., & Aisyah, D. (2025). ANALISIS KUALITAS CUSTOMER SERVICE DALAM MENINGKATKAN LOYALITAS PELANGGAN KANTOR POS CABANG JAMBI. Journal Development, 13(2), 308–318. https://doi.org/10.53978/JD.V13I2.716

Prof. Dr. Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&DMetode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. In Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 6(11), 951–952. (Number Septembfile:///C:/Users/asus/Downloads/29-64-1-SM.pdffile:///C:/Users/asus/Downloads/29-64-1-SM.pdfer 2016).

Rahmadini, C. F. M., & Suhardono, E. (2025). IMPLEMENTASI KEBIJAKAN KEIMIGRASIAN TERHADAP WARGA NEGARA ASING (WNA) DI KANTOR IMIGRASI KELAS I KHUSUS TPI SURABAYA (Studi Kasus UU No 6 Tahun 2011 Tentang Keimigrasian). Jurnal Kebijakan Pemerintahan, 79–97. https://doi.org/10.33701/JKP.V8I1.5427

Sandra Leoni Prakasa Yakub, Santi Suryani, Fitriyani Yuliawati, Muhamad Reza Atqia, & Wili Suminar. (2026). Rekonfigurasi Batas Diskresi Pejabat Administrasi Pasca Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 Tentang Cipta Kerja. SOSIAL: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan IPS, 4(1), 136–154. https://doi.org/10.62383/SOSIAL.V4I1.1570

Sentono, Y. B., & Syahrin, M. A. (2021). DIALECTICS OF DETENTION IMPLEMENTATION IN THE IMMIGRATION INVESTIGATION PROCESS OF OAC CS CASE. Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Keimigrasian, 4(1), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.52617/JIKK.V4I1.217

Sinulingga, W. (2018). TINJAUAN YURIDIS DISKRESI PEJABAT PUBLIK DALAM PENYELENGGARAAN PEMERINTAHAN. Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.14421/SH.V7I1.2034

syakila, N. (2022). Analisis Yuridis Konflik Hukum Adopsi Anak Antarnegara. Jurnal Rechten : Riset Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia, 4(2), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.52005/RECHTEN.V4I2.107

Wardhani, A. K., Harahap, A. R. S., & Ramadhan, A. P. (2024). STANDARISASI PEJABAT IMIGRASI UNTUK MENGGUNAKAN SENJATA API DALAM RANGKA PENEGAKAN HUKUM KEIMIGRASIAN MELALUI STUDI KOMPARASI DENGAN KEIMIGRASIAN NEGARA LAIN. Journal of Law and Border Protection, 6(2), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.52617/JLBP.V6I2.629

Wirapatih, R. (2022). Tinjauan Yuridis Perjanjian Kredit dengan Jaminan Fidusia Berupa Hewan Ternak. Jurnal Hukum Indonesia, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.58344/jhi.v1i1.5

Zandro, W. A., Hamdi, M. A., & Mirwanto, T. (2025). Analisis Diskresi Petugas Imigrasi dalam Penegakan Hukum Keimigrasian di Indonesia. QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia, 4(2), 867–874. https://doi.org/10.57235/QISTINA.V4I2.7055

Downloads

Published

2026-01-16

How to Cite

Atha Yanuar Rafi, Eric Theo Vanes Surbakti, & Enggar Eka Fahrurriza. (2026). Diskresi Pejabat Imigrasi dalam Penerapan Tindakan Administrasi Keimigrasian (TAK) dan Implikasinya terhadap Pengenaan Sanksi Pidana. Amorti: Jurnal Studi Islam Interdisipliner, 5(1), 78–85. https://doi.org/10.59944/amorti.v5i1.812