Language Cognition And Narrative Structure In Leila S. Chudori’s Pulang: A Neurolinguistic Perspective On Literary Reading Instruction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59944/postaxial.v4i3.1950Abstract
This study examines the relationship between linguistic and narrative structures in Leila S. Chudori’s Pulang and their potential cognitive implications for literary reading instruction. The study employs a descriptive qualitative method through textual analysis informed by neurolinguistics and cognitive psychology. The material object is the 2023 edition of Pulang published by Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia, while the formal object concerns the relationship among linguistic structure, narrative structure, cognitive representation, and literary reading comprehension. The data consist of words, phrases, clauses, sentences, and narrative passages selected based on their representation of syntactic complexity, causal relations, sensory vocabulary, memory activation, temporal and spatial shifts, character focus, perspective shifts, and cohesion. Data were analyzed through four stages: identification and classification of relevant textual features, categorization according to cognitive dimensions, theoretical interpretation using concepts of syntactic processing, situation models, event models, inference, memory, and cognitive scaffolding, and synthesis of findings into implications for literary reading instruction. The findings indicate that syntactic relations facilitate the integration of narrative information, sensory vocabulary provides cues for activating cultural and experiential knowledge, and temporal, spatial, character, and perspective shifts require the reader to reorganize developing representations of narrative situations. These patterns are conceptualized as forms of narrative reorientation rather than as experimentally measured cognitive or neural responses. The study suggests that literary reading instruction can use narrative reorientation to develop students’ inferential comprehension, contextual integration, perspective-taking, and reflective interpretation. The study contributes a textual framework that connects neurolinguistic perspectives, narrative structure, situation-model theory, and literary education.
References
Alshehri, M., & Zhang, D. (2022). Word-to-text integration components in second language (L2) reading comprehension. Frontiers in Education, 7, 926663. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.926663
Brich, I. R., Papenmeier, F., Huff, M., & Merkt, M. (2024). Construction or updating? Event model processes during visual narrative comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 31, 2092–2101. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-023-02424-w
Chudori, L. S. (2023). Pulang. Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia.
Coderre, E. L., & Cohn, N. (2024). Individual differences in the neural dynamics of visual narrative comprehension: The effects of proficiency and age of acquisition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 31, 89–103. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-023-02334-x
Friederici, A. D. (2011). The brain basis of language processing: From structure to function. Physiological Reviews, 91(4), 1357–1392. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00006.2011
Gibson, E. (1998). Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition, 68(1), 1–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00034-1
Härtig, H., Bernholt, S., Fraser, N., Cromley, J. G., & Retelsdorf, J. (2022). Comparing reading comprehension of narrative and expository texts based on the direct and inferential mediation model. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20, 17–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10302-5
Ito, S. (2021). The effects of retelling on reading comprehension: Focusing on different levels of comprehension and non-textual information in retelling protocols. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 24, 23–42. https://doi.org/10.20622/jltajournal.24.0_23
Mar, R. A., Li, J., Nguyen, A. T. P., & Ta, C. P. (2021). Memory and comprehension of narrative versus expository texts: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 28, 732–749. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01853-1
Morgan, A. M., von der Malsburg, T., Ferreira, V. S., & Wittenberg, E. (2020). Shared syntax between comprehension and production: Multi-paradigm evidence that resumptive pronouns hinder comprehension. Cognition, 205, 104417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104417
Neri, C. C., Bernholt, S., Härtig, H., Schmitz, A., & Retelsdorf, J. (2024). Cognitive and motivational characteristics as predictors of students’ expository versus narrative text comprehension. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 39, 885–905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-023-00717-1
Odendahl, J. (2021). Embodied cognition, affects and language comprehension: Theoretical basis and (literary-)didactic perspectives of a physically-emotionally grounded model of understanding. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 20, 483–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-020-09684-0
Peng, P. (2020). The cognitive element model of reading instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(S1), S77–S88. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.336
Petersen, D. B., Spencer, T. D., Konishi, A., Sellars, T. P., Foster, M. E., & Robertson, D. (2020). Using parallel, narrative-based measures to examine the relationship between listening and reading comprehension: A pilot study. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 51(4), 1097–1111. https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_LSHSS-19-00036
Pianzola, F. (2024). Dynamical systems, literary theory, and the computational modelling of narrative. Social Epistemology, 38(2), 179–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/03080188241257167
Serrano-Mendizábal, M., Villalón, R., Melero, Á., & Izquierdo-Magaldi, B. (2023). Effects of two computer-based interventions on reading comprehension: Does strategy instruction matter? Computers & Education, 196, 104727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104727
Seger, B. T., Wannagat, W., & Nieding, G. (2021). Children’s surface, textbase, and situation model representations of written and illustrated written narrative text. Reading and Writing, 34, 1415–1440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10118-1
Tucker, A. (2022). Reading texts, reading people: Cognitive literary science and pedagogy. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 21(1), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/14740222211013757
Zwaan, R. A. (2024). Comprehension: From clause to conspiracy narrative. Discourse Processes, 61(4–5), 166–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2024.2327271
Zwaan, R. A., Magliano, J. P., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). Dimensions of situation model construction in narrative comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(2), 386–397. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.21.2.386
Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123(2), 162–185. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.123.2.162



