English Comics To Motivate The Students in Senior High School

Authors

  • Joni
  • Edward Keith Singapore University of Social Sciences, Singapore

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59944/postaxial.v2i1.247

Keywords:

English Comic, Motivate, Students

Abstract

This research was conducted under the considerations that second year students of Senior High School level need media in teaching-learning process. One of them is English comics in learning English. The objectives of the study were to find out whether there is any significant difference in the motivation of student’s mastery in learning English using comics and without using comics and to identify the effectiveness of English comics as a medium of teaching English. The population of this study was the second-year students of Senior High School Number 17 Takengon. The total number of samples in this study were 32 students. The data were collected through pre-test, post-test and questionnaire. In solving the problems, the researcher carried out an experimental study using statistical method called t-test. The writer used two classes: experiment class and control class. In the control class, the writer used written text story. While in the experiment class, the writer uses English comics. The computation result of t-test was 3.04. the t-table was 2.05 for α=5% and df=34. Because tObs was higher than totable (3.04>2.05), it cloud be concluded that there was significant different in the achievement between the students who were taught using comics and students who were taught without using comics. Referring to the experience in conducting this research, the writer offer suggestion to the teacher to motivate the student’s ability in learning English in order to get better result. The use of comic should be maintained frequently and recommended to English teachers, especially to teach Junior high School’s students in order to attract their motivation in learning English to be more fun.

References

A.S. Hornby. 2003. Oxford Learner’s Pocket Dictionary, Third Edition, (New York: Oxford University Press, 2003), p. 168.

B.W. Tuckman. 1978. Conducting Educational Research, (London: Harcourt Brace Jacobovitz, 1978), p. 227.

C. Kennedy Eddie. 1955. Metode in Teaching Development in Reading, (USA: Edition FE,

Peacock Publisher, 1981)

Collier’s. 1955. Encyclopedia, 1955, p. 402

David P Harris and Walter Bartz. 1969. Testing English as a Second Language, (New Jersey: MC. Grow Hill Book Company, 1969), p. 84 & 150.

F. N. Kerlinger. 1965. Foundation of Behavioral Research, (New York: Hott Rinehart, and Winston, Inc, 1965)

Illeris. 2000. Ormorod, 1995, http://en. wikipedia.org/wiki/ Learning_theory_% 28education%29.

J. W. Brown; R. B. Lewis and F. F. Harcleroad, AV. 1977. Instruction: Technology, Media and Method, (New York: Mc. Grow Hill Company, 1977), p. 2-3.

Jeremy Harmer. 2001. The Practice of Language Teaching, (Cambridge: Longman, 2001), p. 134.

Johnson, M. Dona. 1987. Approaches to Research in Second Language Learning, (New York: University of Arizona Longman, 1987).

Locatis and Atkinson. 1984. Roles of Media in a Teaching-Learning Process, 1984, p. 13.

Nana Sudjana dan Ahmad Rifai. 2002. Media Pengajaran, (Bandung: Sinar Baru Algensindo, 2002), p. 64.

Ramelan. 1994. Introduction to Linguistic Analysis, (Semarang: IKIP Semarang Press, 1994), p.3.

Richards, Jack C. dan Rodgers, Theodore S. 2001. Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching (Second edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Richards, Jack C. dan Nunan. David. 1990. Second Language Teacher Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sarip. 2010. Storytelling Through Picture in Development of Speaking Skill, (Faculty of Teacher Training and Pedagogy Science, IBN KHALDUN BOGOR UNIVERSITY, 2010), p. 1.

Scott McCloud. 1993. Understanding Comics, 1993

Soedijarto. 1993. Memantapkan Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta: Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.

Suharsimi Arikunto. 2002. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek, (Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2002), p. 36.

Turney, C. 1992. Conceptualising Classroom Management. The Classromm Manager, (ed). C. Turney, et. al., 1-6. North Sydney, Australia: Allen & Unwin.

V. S. Gerlach and D. P. Elly. 1980. Teaching and Media: A Systeatic Appoarch, (Mew Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1980), p. 241.

Versaci. 2001. Strenghts of Comic in Education, http://www. genayang.com/ comicsedu/strenght. html accessed on december 25th 2011 at 10.30 a.m.

Weir, Cryil J. 1990. Communicative Language Teaching. New York: Prentice Hall.

Willis, Jane. 1996. A Framework for Task-Based Learning. England: Longman

Willis, Jane. 1996. A Framework for Task-Based Learning. England: Longman

__________. 1983. Teaching Language as Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

__________, 2010. Strenghts of Comics in Education, http://www. genayang.com/ comicsedu/ strenght.html accessed on december 25th 2010 at 10.30 a.m.

Downloads

Published

2024-02-29