Japanese Work Culture as a Framework for Vocational Education: A Literature Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59944/postaxial.v4i3.1829Keywords:
Framework, Japanese Work Culture, Literature Review, Vocational EducationAbstract
Vocational education is expected to develop not only technical competencies but also a work culture encompassing discipline, quality, safety, problem solving, and continuous improvement. This study aimed to identify and synthesize relevant Japanese work-culture concepts and develop a framework for their application in vocational education. A systematic literature review using a descriptive qualitative synthesis was conducted. Literature was retrieved primarily through Google Scholar using inclusion criteria covering peer-reviewed journal articles published between 2010 and 2026 that addressed 9S, Kaizen, Gemba, Kanban, Poka-Yoke, Muda, Jidoka, Andon, Heijunka, Takt Time, Hoshin Kanri, or Genchi Genbutsu. The selected literature was analyzed according to meaning, purpose, typical tools, implementation examples, involvement level, impact area, and benefits. The synthesis generated a four-layer Japanese Work Culture Framework for Vocational Education: Work Culture Foundation (9S and Kaizen); Evidence-Based Problem Solving and Built-in Quality (Gemba, Genchi Genbutsu, Muda, Poka-Yoke, Jidoka, and Andon); Work and Production Flow (Kanban, Heijunka, and Takt Time); and Strategic Alignment (Hoshin Kanri). The framework demonstrates that Japanese work-culture principles can be pedagogically adapted to strengthen work culture, evidence-based problem solving, quality, workflow management, and strategic alignment in vocational education.
References
Åhlström, P. (2015). Jidoka. In C. L. Cooper (Ed.), Wiley encyclopedia of management. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118785317.weom100183
Ahmed, H. O. K. (2016). A proposed systematic framework for applying Hoshin Kanri strategic planning methodology in educational institutions. European Scientific Journal, 12(16), 158–194. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2016.v12n16p158
Aij, K. H., & Teunissen, M. (2017). Lean leadership attributes: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 31(7/8), 713–729. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-12-2016-0245
Ali, R. M., & Deif, A. M. (2014). Dynamic lean assessment for takt time implementation. Procedia CIRP, 17, 577–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.01.128
Bhamu, J., & Sangwan, K. S. (2014). Lean manufacturing: Literature review and research issues. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 34(7), 876–940. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-08-2012-0315
Bortolotti, T., Boscari, S., & Danese, P. (2015). Successful lean implementation: Organizational culture and soft lean practices. International Journal of Production Economics, 160, 182–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.10.013
Bramer, W. M., de Jonge, G. B., Rethlefsen, M. L., Mast, F., & Kleijnen, J. (2018). A systematic approach to searching: An efficient and complete method to develop literature searches. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 106(4), 531–541. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2018.283
Carrera-Rivera, A., Ochoa, W., Larrinaga, F., & Lasa, G. (2022). How-to conduct a systematic literature review: A quick guide for computer science research. MethodsX, 9, 101895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2022.101895
Chatigny, C. (2022). Occupational health and safety in initial vocational training: Reflection on the issues of prescription and integration in teaching and learning activities. Safety Science, 147, 105580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105580
Díaz Reza, J. R., García Alcaraz, J. L., & Márquez Figueroa, L. J. (2023). Beneficios de gestión visual sobre Justo a Tiempo en la industria maquiladora. Cultura Científica y Tecnológica, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.20983/culcyt.2023.2.2a.3
García Alcaraz, J. L., Limon-Romero, J., Jiménez Macías, E., Aryanfar, Y., Barragán, A. J., & Reallyvásquez Vargas, A. (2026). From Kaizen to sustainability: How operational lean tools drive the Triple Bottom Line. Journal of Cleaner Production, 574, 149103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2026.149103
García-Alcaraz, J. L., Morales García, A. S., Díaz-Reza, J. R., Jiménez Macías, E., Javierre Lardies, C., & Blanco Fernández, J. (2022). Effect of lean manufacturing tools on sustainability: The case of Mexican maquiladoras. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(26), 39622–39637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-18978-6
Glover, W. J., Farris, J. A., & Van Aken, E. M. (2014). Kaizen events: Assessing the existing literature and convergence of practices. Engineering Management Journal, 26(1), 39–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/10429247.2014.11432003
Haddaway, N. R., Collins, A. M., Coughlin, D., & Kirk, S. (2015). The role of Google Scholar in evidence reviews and its applicability to grey literature searching. PLOS ONE, 10(9), e0138237. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138237
Harzing, A.-W., & Alakangas, S. (2016). Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: A longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison. Scientometrics, 106(2), 787–804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1798-9
Hernández-Castorena, O., Colín-Salgado, M., & Velásquez-Espinosa, N. (2018). Análisis de la relación hábitos y aceptación de 9’s como elemento de competitividad en la pyme manufacturera de Aguascalientes, México. Revista CEA, 4(7), 29–47. https://doi.org/10.22430/24223182.757
Insani, L. A. B., & Wardhani, N. W. (2026). Internalisasi etos kerja siswa SMK melalui budaya Kaizen: Studi kualitatif di SMKN 1 Magelang. Nusantara: Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 6(2), 346–359. https://doi.org/10.62491/njpi.2026.v6i2-6
Iwao, S. (2017). Revisiting the existing notion of continuous improvement (Kaizen): Literature review and field research of Toyota from a perspective of innovation. Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, 14(1), 29–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40844-017-0067-4
Jasti, N. V. K., & Kodali, R. (2015). Lean production: Literature review and trends. International Journal of Production Research, 53(3), 867–885. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2014.937508
Kumar, N., Hasan, S. S., Srivastava, K., Akhtar, R., Yadav, R. K., & Choubey, V. K. (2022). Lean manufacturing techniques and its implementation: A review. Materials Today: Proceedings, 64(3), 1188–1192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.03.481
Martín-Martín, A., Orduna-Malea, E., & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2018). Coverage of highly-cited documents in Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A multidisciplinary comparison. Scientometrics, 116(3), 2175–2188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2820-9
Matzka, J., Furmans, K., & Di Mascolo, M. (2012). Buffer sizing of a Heijunka Kanban system. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 23(1), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-009-0317-3
Maulidina, A., & Wijanarka, B. S. (2023). Analysis of work readiness based on soft skills, machining knowledge, and 5S work culture. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 4(4), 53–58. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2023.4.4.710
Melander, A. (2016). Introducing the Hoshin Kanri strategic management system in manufacturing SMEs. Management Decision, 54(10), 2507–2523. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-03-2016-0148
Muka, T., Glisic, M., Milic, J., Verhoog, S., Bohlius, J., Bramer, W., Chowdhury, R., & Franco, O. H. (2020). A 24-step guide on how to design, conduct, and successfully publish a systematic review and meta-analysis in medical research. European Journal of Epidemiology, 35, 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-019-00576-5
Netland, T. H. (2016). Critical success factors for implementing lean production: The effect of contingencies. International Journal of Production Research, 54(8), 2433–2448. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2015.1096976
New, S., Hadi, M., Pickering, S., Robertson, E., Morgan, L., Griffin, D., Collins, G., Rivero-Arias, O., Catchpole, K., & McCulloch, P. (2016). Lean participative process improvement: Outcomes and obstacles in trauma orthopaedics. PLOS ONE, 11(4), e0152360. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152360
Nicholas, J. (2016). Hoshin kanri and critical success factors in quality management and lean production. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 27(3–4), 250–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2014.976938
Okoli, C. (2015). A guide to conducting a standalone systematic literature review. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 37, 879–910. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.03743
Pradipta, B. Q., Hirawan, F. B., & Ragamustari, S. K. (2021). Evaluation of policy in the vocational education system revitalization in Indonesia: Examining the teaching factory readiness of industry. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 11(1), 68–77. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v11i1.37693
PRISMA. (2021). PRISMA 2020 flow diagram. https://www.prisma-statement.org/prisma-2020-flow-diagram
Pötters, P., Schmitt, R., & Leyendecker, B. (2018). Effectivity of quality methods used on the shop floor of a serial production—How important is Poka Yoke? Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 29(9–10), 1200–1212. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2018.1488559
Randhawa, J. S., & Ahuja, I. S. (2017). 5S—A quality improvement tool for sustainable performance: Literature review and directions. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 34(3), 334–361. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-03-2015-0045
Rossi, A. H. G., Marcondes, G. B., Pontes, J., Leitão, P., Treinta, F. T., De Resende, L. M. M., Mosconi, E., & Yoshino, R. T. (2022). Lean tools in the context of Industry 4.0: Literature review, implementation and trends. Sustainability, 14(19), 12295. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912295
Safrani, I. D. P., Madhakomala, R., & Mayasari, L. I. (2026). Vocational education partnerships and Industry 4.0 workforce readiness: Pendidikan vokasi di era Industri 4.0: Evaluasi kemitraan dengan dunia usaha dan dunia industri. Academia Open, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.21070/acopen.11.2026.14415
Saputro, I. N., Soenarto, Sofyan, H., Riyanita, M. C., Rebia, P. S., & Listiana, A. (2021). The effectiveness of teaching factory implementation in vocational education: Case studies in Indonesia. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 9(11), 1841–1856. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2021.091104
Sauer, P. C., & Seuring, S. (2023). How to conduct systematic literature reviews in management research: A guide in 6 steps and 14 decisions. Review of Managerial Science, 17, 1899–1933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-023-00668-3
Saurin, T. A., Ribeiro, J. L. D., & Vidor, G. (2012). A framework for assessing poka-yoke devices. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 31(3), 358–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2012.04.001
Sujastika, I., Endarto, D., & Fauzan, A. (2026). A theoretical framework for strengthening occupational safety and health and 5S as a foundation for industrial culture. Jurnal Kependidikan: Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran, 10(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v10i1.93590
Thürer, M., Stevenson, M., & Protzman, C. W., III. (2016). Card-based production control: A review of the control mechanisms underpinning Kanban, ConWIP, POLCA and COBACABANA systems. Production Planning & Control, 27(14), 1143–1157. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2016.1188224
Wahjusaputri, S., Bunyamin, B., & Nastiti, T. I. (2021). Critical success factors in implementing teaching factory-based competency for vocational high school students. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 40(3), 584–592. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v40i3.28877
Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971
Yoto, Marsono, Suyetno, A., Mawangi, P. A. N., Romadin, A., & Paryono. (2024). The role of industry to unlock the potential of the Merdeka curriculum for vocational school. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2335820. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2335820
