Tafaqquh sebagai Proses Pembentukan Motivasi Belajar dalam Q.S. al-Taubah [9]:122
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59944/amorti.v5i4.1939Keywords:
Tafaqquh, learning motivation, Thematic interpretation, Q.S. Al-Taubah, Islamic educationAbstract
This study aims to analyze tafaqquh as a process of developing learning motivation in Q.S. al-Tawbah [9]:122 through a thematic exegesis approach and a dialogue with contemporary theories of learning motivation. It employs a qualitative method with a library research design. The primary data consist of Q.S. al-Tawbah [9]:122 and selected Qur’anic commentaries chosen purposively, while the secondary data include classical Islamic scholarly works, academic publications, and literature on research methodology and Islamic education. The analysis was conducted in four stages: identifying the context of the verse, conducting a semantic analysis of its key terms, synthesizing its educational themes, and engaging the findings in a conceptual dialogue with theories of motivation. The findings indicate that tafaqquh cannot be reduced to the mere acquisition of religious information. Rather, it represents a process of intellectual deepening that requires cognitive engagement, perseverance, internalization, and readiness to overcome learning difficulties. Within the structure of the verse, this process is connected to a normative orientation prior to learning and social responsibility following the learning process. Qur’anic learning motivation can therefore be conceptualized as a multilayered construct comprising meaningful orientation, the deepening of knowledge, and the transformation of knowledge into social benefit. These findings enrich theories of learning motivation by incorporating the dimensions of transcendence and communal responsibility. They also offer implications for Islamic education, suggesting that learning should integrate spiritual purposes, deep learning activities, reflection, and social contribution. Since this study is conceptual, further empirical investigation involving learners and educational institutions is required
References
Al-Zarnuji, B. (2004). Ta’lim al-Muta’allim Thariq at-Ta’allum. Darul Kutub al-Ilmiyyah.
Aulia, M. H., Syahidin, Faizin, M. N., & Ali, M. M. F. (2025). Qur’anic tadabbur models for enhancing students’ character and spiritual awareness. Islamic Review: Jurnal Riset Dan Kajian Keislaman, 14(1), 133–156. https://doi.org/10.35878/islamicreview.v14i1.1497
Biesta, G. (2009). Good education in an age of measurement: on the need to reconnect with the question of purpose in education. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9064-9
Bolino, M. C., & Grant, A. M. (2016). The Bright Side of Being Prosocial at Work, and the Dark Side, Too: A Review and Agenda for Research on Other-Oriented Motives, Behavior, and Impact in Organizations. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 599–670. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2016.1153260
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. Qualitative Psychology, 9(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000196
Byrne, D. (2022). A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Quality & Quantity, 56(3), 1391–1412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational Beliefs, Values, and Goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109–132. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153
Fanani, A., Hamzani, A. I., Khasanah, N., & Sofanudin, A. (2021). Muhammadiyah’s Manhaj Tarjih: An evolution of a modernist approach to Islamic jurisprudence in Indonesia. HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies, 77(4). https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v77i4.6942
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
Hamka. (2015). Tafsir Al-Azhar. Gema Insani.
Ibn ’Ashur, M. al-T. (1984). Al-Tahrir wa al-Tanwir. Al-Dar al-Tunisiyyah.
Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Deci, E. L. (2010). Engaging students in learning activities: It is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 588–600. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019682
M. Quraish Shihab. (2007). Wawasan Al-Quran Tafsir Tematik Atas Pelbagai Persoalan. Mizan.
Maryani, W., Harahap, A. M. S., Samsuddin, S., & Idharudin, A. J. (2026). Tadabbur Al-Qur’an Perspektif Nashir Al-Umar dan Implikasinya terhadap Pendidikan Islam Kontemporer. Peradaban Journal of Religion and Society, 5(1), 118–146. https://doi.org/10.59001/pjrs.v5i1.765
Mega, C., Ronconi, L., & De Beni, R. (2014). What makes a good student? How emotions, self-regulated learning, and motivation contribute to academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033546
Meng, C., Zhang, L., Shang, Y., Liu, S., Liu, Y., Guo, Y., Deng, Z., & Gao, R. (2025). Meaning in life profiles across adolescence and their impact on mental health: A population-based cross-sectional developmental study in China. Personality and Individual Differences, 246, 113382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2025.113382
Mirza, A. Z., Zunairoh, Y., & Ahid, N. (2026). Transforming Arabic Academic Writing Competence through ADDIE-Based Instructional Design: A Developmental Study. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.38073/jpi.4232
Musthafa Muslim. (2000). Mabahits fi at Tafsir al Maudhu’i. Dar al-Qalam.
O’Shea, A., Booth, J. L., Barbieri, C., McGinn, K. M., Young, L. K., & Oyer, M. H. (2017). Algebra performance and motivation differences for students with learning disabilities and students of varying achievement levels. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 50, 80–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.03.003
Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 422. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422
Pargament, K. I. (2007). Spiritually integrated psychotherapy: Understanding and addressing the sacred. Guilford Press.
Prananto, K., Cahyadi, S., Lubis, F. Y., & Hinduan, Z. R. (2025). Perceived teacher support and student engagement among higher education students – a systematic literature review. BMC Psychology, 13(1), 112. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02412-w
Qorib, M., & Afandi, A. (2024). Implementing Prophetic Values in the Islamic Life Guidelines for Muhammadiyah Citizens: A Qualitative Analysis for Transforming Science and Technology. MIQOT: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman, 48(1). https://doi.org/10.30821/miqot.v48i1.1129
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
Sarnoto, A. Z., & Abnisa, A. P. (2022). Motivasi Belajar dalam Perspektif Al-Qur’an. Scaffolding: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Dan Multikulturalisme, 4(2), 210–219. https://doi.org/10.37680/scaffolding.v4i2.1609
Schoor, C., & Bannert, M. (2011). Motivation in a computer-supported collaborative learning scenario and its impact on learning activities and knowledge acquisition. Learning and Instruction, 21(4), 560–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.11.002
Shihab, M. Q. (2002). Tafsir al-Mishbah: Pesan, kesan, dan keserasian Al-Qur’an (Vol. 5). Lentera Hati.
Steger, M. F., Frazier, P., Oishi, S., & Kaler, M. (2006). The Meaning in Life Questionnaire: Assessing the Presence of and Search for Meaning in Life. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53(1), 80–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.53.1.80
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy–Value Theory of Achievement Motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
Yasmin, F., Muhammad Umar Farooq, & Syed Kazim Shah. (2023). Impact of Exam-Oriented Education System on Undergraduate Students’ Cognitive, Affective and Psychomotor Competencies. International Journal of Linguistics and Culture, 4(1), 109–125. https://doi.org/10.52700/ijlc.v4i1.180



























