Quantity Transparency and Transactional Fairness in Unweighed Coconut Milk Sales: An Islamic Economic Law Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59944/amorti.v5i4.1569Keywords:
Quantity Transparency; Transactional Fairness; Gharar; ‘Urf; Islamic Economic LawAbstract
This study examines quantity transparency and transactional fairness in the sale of fresh coconut milk without standardized weighing in Talang Babat Village, Tanjung Jabung Timur, Indonesia, from the perspective of Islamic economic law. The study responds to the persistence of informal measurement practices in which quantity is determined through visual estimation and non-standardized plastic bags, despite the potential implications for contractual certainty and consumer protection. Employing a qualitative multiple-case study design, the research involved three coconut milk sellers, consumers, and Islamic economic law experts. Data were collected through non-participant observation, semi-structured interviews, and documentation, and analyzed using an interactive process of data condensation, data display, and conclusion drawing, supported by source and methodological triangulation. The findings reveal two contrasting transaction mechanisms. One seller applies standardized weighing, enabling consumers to objectively verify the relationship between price and quantity, while another relies on plastic-bag sizes and visual estimation. In the latter practice, the same price category produced substantial quantity variation, approximately 180–270 ml, thereby limiting consumers’ ability to independently verify the quantity received. The practice is sustained by local custom (‘urf), interpersonal trust, convenience, and limited knowledge of fiqh mu‘āmalah, rather than demonstrable intentional deception. From the perspective of Islamic economic law, the practice contains a significant element of gharar and is characterized as an akad fasid because the essential requirement of quantity certainty (ma‘lum al-maqadir) is inadequately fulfilled, while tadlis cannot be conclusively established. The study further demonstrates that the practice potentially undermines ‘adl, tarāḍin, and ḥifẓ al-māl. Accordingly, the study recommends a transition from a trust-based system toward a trust-and-verification model through standardized weighing, transparent disclosure of quantity, and consumer education.
References
Abdussalam, F., & Inayati, A. A. (2023). Kelalaian pelaku usaha terhadap produk tanpa label halal dan informasi kedaluarsa: Analisis hukum ekonomi syariah dan Undang-Undang Perlindungan Konsumen. El-Hisbah: Journal of Islamic Economic Law, 3(1).
Aini, F. N., & Azzaki, M. A. (2024). The concept of justice in the perspective of Islamic business ethics. Neraca: Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen dan Akuntansi, 3(3), 929–936.
Aqmal, F. Z., Muthoifin, & Ashraf, S. (2025). Legal protection against gharar in sharia e-commerce: A consumer law analysis in support of the SDGs. Profetika: Jurnal Studi Islam, 26(2), 615–630. https://doi.org/10.23917/profetika.v26i02.12036
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2023). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Fadlurrahman, I., & Fikrianihayah, A. N. (2022). Consumer protection in e-commerce transactions through Shopee application according to sharia economic law. Al-Muamalat: Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah, 9(1), 14–19. https://doi.org/10.15575/am.v9i1.13920
Hakim, C. L. (2023). Philosophy and legal principles of ‘adam al-gharar bai’ al-salam and its embodiments in online transactions. International Journal of Nusantara Islam, 11(1), 69–90. https://doi.org/10.15575/ijni.v11i1.6417
Hulaimi, A., Hafiz, A., & Juma, A. (2024). Penerapan etika bisnis Islam dalam transaksi jual beli pada pedagang di Pasar Pagesangan Mataram. Journal of Sharia Economy and Islamic Tourism, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.31764/jseit.v5i1.27958
Itsnawati, T., Zainurridla, & Supandi, A. F. (2024). Etika bisnis Islam dan transparansi transaksi: Studi pada perdagangan daging ayam di pasar rakyat. Moderasi: Journal of Islamic Studies, 5(2), 615–628. https://doi.org/10.54471/moderasi.v5i2.136
Jatmiko, W., Iqbal, A., & Ebrahim, M. S. (2024). On the ethicality of Islamic banks’ business model. British Journal of Management, 35(1), 115–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12703
Karimullah, S. S. (2025). Konsep gharār dan pengaruhnya terhadap keadilan ekonomi. ESA: Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi Syariah, 7(1), 10–25. https://doi.org/10.58293/esa.v7i1.125
Latifah, S., Syarifuddin, Sahfutra, S. A., & Anggaraini, R. M. (2024). Application of Islamic business ethics by Muslim traders in Klambir Lima Kebun Village, Hamparan Perak District, Deli Serdang Regency. Prosiding Fakultas Agama Islam Universitas Dharmawangsa, 4.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Puad, N. A. M., & Hamdi, A. S. (2025). Maqasid Shariah and consumer protection in e-commerce: Strengthening legal safeguards in Indonesia’s digital economy. International Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance Research, 1, 64–75. https://doi.org/10.53840/ijiefer222
Shohih, H., & Setyowati, R. (2021). Perspektif hukum Islam mengenai praktik gharar dalam transaksi perbankan syariah. Dialogia Iuridica, 12(2), 69–82. https://doi.org/10.28932/di.v12i2.3323
Stenfors, T., Kajamaa, A., & Bennett, D. (2020). How to … assess the quality of qualitative research. The Clinical Teacher, 17(6), 596–599. https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.13242
Republik Indonesia. (1999). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen.



























