The Epistemological Evolution of the Integration of Knowledge: From al-Faruqi’s Islamization of Knowledge towards Amin Abdullah’s Interconnection and Kuntowijoyo’s Prophetic Social Science

Authors

  • Eko Ngabdul Shodikin Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Tarbiyah Madani Yogyakarta
  • Miftahuddin UIN Salatiga
  • Mansur UIN Salatiga

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59944/jipsi.v5i1.810

Keywords:

Integration of Knowledge, Epistemological Evolution, al-Faruqi, Amin Abdullah, Kuntowijoyo, Social Problem Solving

Abstract

The challenges of modernity and the complexity of social crises demand a repositioning of Islamic education so that it does not become trapped in the dichotomy of secular and normative sciences. To address this need, this study aims to examine and synthesize the epistemological evolution of the discourse on the integration of knowledge through a comparative analysis of the thoughts of Ismail Raji al-Faruqi, M. Amin Abdullah, and Kuntowijoyo. Employing a qualitative approach with a library research design and content analysis techniques, this study dissects the fundamental structures of the primary literature of these three figures to trace their ontological, epistemological, and axiological frameworks. The results of the study indicate a linear and complementary paradigm shift. This evolution was initiated by methodological purification efforts through al-Faruqi's Islamization of Knowledge, then progressed toward an open interdisciplinary dialogue through Amin Abdullah's Integration-Interconnection paradigm, and culminated in practical field transformation through Kuntowijoyo's Prophetic Social Sciences. The conclusion of this study confirms that these three concepts do not negate one another, but rather form a complete continuum of the "Prophetic Integration" model. The epistemology of Islamic scholarship has proven to have maturely evolved from a mere instrument of cognitive-textual transmission into an instrument of social engineering. This tripartite construction provides both a philosophical and tactical foundation for higher education institutions to produce advanced graduates who are not only theoretically sound but also capable of operationalizing knowledge as a concrete tool for solving socio-humanitarian problems.

References

Abdullah, M. A. (2006). Islamic studies di perguruan tinggi: Pendekatan integratif-interkonektif. Pustaka Pelajar.

Al-Faruqi, I. (1988). Islamization Of Knowledge General Principles and Work Plan (Third Edit). International Graphics. https://www.muslim-library.com/dl/books/English_Islamization_of_Knowledge_General_Principles_and_Work_Plan.pdf

Ayu, A., Permatasari, D., & Maulida, H. S. (2024). Integration of Islamic sciences according to M. Amin Abdullah and its implications for Islamic universities. Jurnal Asy-Syukriyyah, 25(1), 62–76. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36769/asy.v25i1.475

Creswell W. J. and Creswell J. D. (2018). Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Research Design Qualitative Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. In Research Design (Vol. 5, Issue June). SAGE Publications.

Effendi, M. R., Aulia, R. N., Amaliyah, A., & Salsabila, N. F. (2023). Integrasi Pendidikan Islam Berbasis Ilmu Sosial Profetik dalam Penguatan Keberagamaan Mahasiswa. Muttaqien; Indonesian Journal of Multidiciplinary Islamic Studies, 4(2), 161–176. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.52593/mtq.04.2.06

Glyptou, K. (2025). Technology-Enabled Sustainability: Behavior-Based Carbon Footprint Levy in Hotels. Strategic Change, 34(4), 597–607. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.2641

H.E. Bahruddin dan Asep Saepul H. (2016). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif (Aplikasi Dalam Pendidikan). In Deeppublish. Deepublish. https://www.google.com/books?hl=id&lr=&id=nhwaCgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR6&dq=menyatakan+terkait+metode+sendiri+yang+memiliki+makna+sebagai+sistem+kerja+dalam+pemakaian+suatu+objek+yang+akan+menjadi+target+ilmu+terkait.+Oleh+karenanya+dengan+pertimbangan+kesesu

Had, A. Bin. (2019). The utopia of islamization: Between distant ideas and inept theories. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 9(4), 273–289. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85080122916&partnerID=40&md5=9797eb4c6d814333f9e574b232bfe488

In’Ami, M., Bambang, null, & Wekke, I. S. (2025). Contextualising Adab in Islamic Education from the Perspective of Al-Attas. Journal of Al-Tamaddun, 20(1), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.22452/JAT.vol20no1.11

Juschten, M., Reinwald, F., & Jiricka-Pürrer, A. (2025). Challenge accepted – identifying barriers and facilitating climate change adaptation in spatial development across planning boundaries, sectors and planning levels. Environmental Science and Policy, 171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104152

Kosim, M., Kustati, M., & Murkilim, null. (2020). Syed Muhammad Naquib Al-Attas1 Ideas On The Islamization Of Knowledge And Its Relevance With Islamic Education In Indonesia. Miqot: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman, 44(2), 250–267. https://doi.org/10.30821/miqot.v44i2.724

Matthew B. Miles, A. Michael Huberman, and J. S. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (Third Edit). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Muslih, M., Khakim, U., & Sahidin, A. (2024). An In-Depth Analysis Of Al Faruqi’s Theory Of Islamization Of Knowledge: A Perspective From Thomas Kuhn’s Paradigm Shift Theory. Hamdard Islamicus, 47(1), 27–49. https://doi.org/10.57144/hi.v47i1.436

Nisa, A., & Ibrahim, R. (2025). Scientific Integration of Perspectives M. Amin Abdullah (Integrative-Interconnective Approach). Al-Afkar, Journal For Islamic Studies, 8(1), 298–306. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31943/afkarjournal.v8i1.1023

Pan, S., Hafez, B., Iskandar, A., & Ming, Z. (2024). Integrating constructivist principles in an adaptive hybrid learning system for developing social entrepreneurship education among college students. Learning and Motivation, 87, 102023. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0023969024000651

Rahman, G. (2025). Reconstructing Islamic Identity in Modern Times: A Narrative Review of Educational Reform and Intellectual Responses. Sinergi International Journal of Islamic Studies, 3(1), 29–43. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.61194/ijis.v3i1.708

Rahmani, D. A., Najmi, V. N., & Dewi, E. (2026). Reconstructing Islamic Epistemology: A Philosophical Analysis of Amin Abdullah’s Integrative–Interconnected Paradigm. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam Al-Thariqah, 11(1), 169–182. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25299/althariqah.2026.vol11(1).27798

Rahmat, A., Bakar, M. Y. A., Mas’ud, A., & Karomah, F. F. (2026). Integration-Interconnection Paradigm as An Academic Strategy in The Deradicalization of Religious Thought in Islamic Higher Education. Jurnal Cendekia Media Komunikasi Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Pendidikan Islam, 18(01), 177–192.

Riyanto, W. F. (2025). Intersubjective Social Science and Divine Foundations in Indonesia: A Civilisational Reading Of Ibn Khaldūn and Kuntowijoyo. Al-Shajarah, 30(2), 421–456. https://doi.org/10.31436/shajarah.v30i02.1766

Rosanawati, I. M. R., Warto, W., Djono, D., & Purwanta, H. (2025). Pedagogical Model Innovation Based on Ki Hajar Dewantara’s Among System for History Learning in the Merdeka Curriculum. Educational Process: International Journal, 14. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.14.39

Saif, L. (2024). The past and future of the study of Islamic esotericism. Religion Compass, 18(7). https://doi.org/10.1111/rec3.12494

Downloads

Published

2026-02-27